Crack fox transcript

Is it fiscally conservative to have a trillion-dollar expenditure? So let me begin with this. I actually believe — first of all, this is their money. They do pay. Everyone pays payroll tax. This is their money. This is not our money.

The family is the most important institution in society. And, yes…. I know that Rand is a committed isolationist. I believe the world is a stronger and a better place, when the United States is the strongest military power in the world. Yeah, but, Marco! PAUL How is it conservative to add a trillion dollars in military expenditures? There are radical jihadist in the Middle East beheading people and crucifying Christians. As we go further, and further into debt, we become less, and less safe.

Can you be a conservative, and be liberal on military spending? No, we need a safe country, but, you know, we spend more on our military than the next ten countries combined? You think defending this nation is expensive, try not defending it. But, you can do that, and pay for it.

You can do that, and also be fiscally responsible. You know, I mention that the 25 programs that I put today, that I would eliminate them. Among them are corporate welfare, like sugar subsidies. Sugar subsidies. Sugar farmers farm under…. I would end those subsidies to pay for defending this nation…. Ask yourself this question, how is it possible that the federal government gets more money each and every year, which the federal government has been doing, receiving more money every year for 50 years under republicans and democrats alike, and yet, never has enough money to do the important things?

The answer? Every dollar must be examined. Any dollar can be cut. Any dollar can be cut, any dollar can be moved. We have to go to a three page tax code. You lower every rate, you close every loophole, why? Because the government uses the tax code to decide winners, and losers.

You have to strip the corruption out of the tax code to pay for it. You have to know where every single dollar is being spent…. I agree with Marco, I agree with Ted, we have no choice. And, I can tell you this with certainty. We all have a different tax plan. One thing we understand, each one of those tax plans is better than the mess that we have right now. I really want to move on. Why would you reverse more than 50 years of U. The TPP is horrible deal. It is a deal that is going to lead to nothing but trouble.

So complex that nobodies read it. They passed it; nobody read it. And look at mess we have right now. And it will be repealed. But this is one of the worst trade deals. And I would, yes, rather not have it. We will do much better. We lose a fortune on trade.

The United States loses with everybody. I love trade. The — the deal, as you say, the terms of the deal were published — were published just last week, the details, 5, pages of it, and 80 percent of U.

Which — are there particular parts of the deal that you think were badly negotiated? And as you understand, I mean, you understand very well from the Wall Street Journal, currency manipulation is the single great weapon people have. If it is approved, it will just be more bad trade deals, more loss of jobs for our country.

I want to bring jobs back into this country. When I say, Senator, that if — if this deal is not ratified by — by the U. And if the U. There is an important point, though, about how we discuss these trade treaties that I do agree with Mr. Trump on. We should negotiate from a position of strength. And we also should negotiate using the full force and the constitutional power that was given to us. We give up the power to amend. And I think, really, one of the big problems we have in our country is, over the last century, really, so much power has gravitated to the executive branch.

Really, Congress is kind of a bystander. The executive branch does. So even in trade — and I am for trade — I think we should be careful about giving so much power to the presidency. Coming up, the biggest threats facing the next commander-in-chief. Welcome back. Welcome back to the Republican presidential debate. The candidates taking the questions you want answered. Also tonight, you can see what America is saying about the debate.

Go to Facebook and type gopdebate into the search box. Now, back to the questions. Americans face security threats at home and abroad. Last year, terrorist attacks rose 61 percent, according to the Institute for Economics and Peace, with the most deaths occurring in just five countries, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Nigeria, and Syria.

Carson, you were against putting troops on the ground in Iraq and against a large military force in Afghanistan.

And what we have to recognize is that Putin is trying to really spread his influence throughout the Middle East. This is going to be his base. And we have to oppose him there in an effective way. You know, the Chinese are there, as well as the Russians, and you have all kinds of factions there. But we have to look at this on a much more global scale.

And their desire is to destroy us and to destroy our way of life. So we have to be saying, how do we make them look like losers? And I think in order to make them look like losers, we have to destroy their caliphate. And you look for the easiest place to do that?

It would be in Iraq. Take that from them. Take all of that land from them. But you have to continue to face them, because our goal is not to contain them, but to destroy them before they destroy us. This word cloud shows what people are focusing on the most. The bigger the word, the more the talk. One of the most discussed issues in the last month, homeland security. Governor Bush, what is the biggest threat facing America today? He does not believe it, and the net result is that we have a caliphate the size of Indiana that gains energy each and everyday to recruit Americans in our own country, and the threat to the homeland relates to the fact that we have not dealt with this threat of terror in the Middle East.

We should have a no fly zone in Syria. We should have a support for the remnants of the Syrian Free Army, and create safe zones. And, that requires American leadership. Without American leadership every other country in the neighborhood beings to change their priorities. It is tragic that you see Iraq, and other countries now talking to Russia.

And, so, the United States needs to lead across the board. Now, Russia has invaded Ukraine, and has put troops in Syria. You have said you will have a good relationship with Mr. We have problems with North Korea where they actually have nuclear weapons. So, we have more than just Russia. But, as far as the Ukraine is concerned, and you could Syria — as far as Syria, I like — if Putin wants to go in, and I got to know him very well because we were both on 60 Minutes, we were stablemates, and we did very well that night.

He cannot be in love with these people. As far as the Ukraine is concerned, we have a group of people, and a group of countries, including Germany — tremendous economic behemoth — why are we always doing the work? Our roads, our bridges, our schools, our airports, and we have to start investing money in our country. He is absolutely wrong on this.

We have to lead, we have to be involved. There are — they are barrel bombing the innocents in that country. Assad is a bad guy, but we have no idea who the so-called rebels — I read about the rebels, nobody even knows who they are.

They may be far worse than Assad. Look at Libya. Look at Iraq. All over. We have nothing. And, I said, keep the oil. And we should have kept the oil, believe me. We should have kept the oil.

And, you know what? We should have given the oil…. Iran, and ISIS. You know, Mr. Trump fancies himself a very good negotiator. Senator Paul should know that as well. I would start rebuilding the Sixth Fleet right under his nose, rebuilding the military — the missile defense program in Poland right under his nose. I would conduct very aggressive military exercises in the Baltic States so that he understood we would protect our NATO allies….

That is why Governor Bush is correct. We must have a no fly zone in Syria because Russia cannot tell the United States of America where and when to fly our planes. We also have a set of allies…. They have asked us specifically over, and over again to support them. The Egyptians are asking us to share intelligence, we are not, I will.

The Kurds have asked us to arm them for three years, we are not, I would. Senator Paul, you have already said, sir, that that would be a mistake in not talking to Vladimir Putin, or to rule it out.

With that in mind, do you think the same applies to administration efforts right now to include the Iranians in talks on Syria? Russia flies in that zone at the invitation of Iraq. This is an important question. This is an incredibly important question. And the question goes to be, who do we want to be our commander-in-chief?

Do you want a commander-in-chief who says something that we never did throughout the entire Cold War, to discontinue having conversations with the Russians? I am not happy about them flying over there. That is naive to the point of being something you might hear in junior high.

Most of the people who want to the no-fly zone also favored arming the allies of al Qaeda, which became ISIS. That was the dumbest, most foolhardy notion. And most of the people up here supported it. They wanted to arm the allies of al Qaeda.

Some of them still do. I need to add a couple of points to this. And is using to build up his military in a rapid way despite the fact his economy is a disaster. He understands only geopolitical strength. His calculation in the Middle East is that he has seen what this president has done, which is nothing, the president has no strategy, our allies in the region do not trust us. For goodness sake, there is only one pro-American free enterprise democracy in the Middle East, it is the state of Israel.

And we have a president that treats the prime minister of Israel with less respect than what he gives the ayatollah in Iran. Vladimir Putin is exploiting that weakness, for purposes of edging the Americans out as the most important geopolitical power broker in the region.

And we do have a vested interest. They are a significant presence in Libya, and in Afghanistan, and a growing presence in Pakistan. Soon they will be in Turkey. They will try Jordan. They will try Saudi Arabia. They are coming to us. They recruit Americans using social media. They hate us because of our values.

They hate us because our girls go to school. They hate us because women drive in the United States. Either they win or we win, and we had better take this risk seriously, it is not going away on its own.

Governor Kasich, I want to ask you about China, in particular hundreds of American companies have been subjected to cyber attacks from the Chinese military, yet state-backed Chinese companies, growing their presence in the United States, Chinese investments in U.

And as my newspaper recently reported, Chinese companies are planning to bid for one of the largest hotel chains in the United States, what would be the largest ever Chinese takeover of a U. Would you stop them? Let me tell you this, Mr. Baker, in terms of the cyber attacks, we have the capability to not only have a defensive posture, but it also to make it clear to people that if you attack us with cyber attacks, we will destroy the mechanisms that you are using to attack us.

I want to give you a little trip around the world. I served on the Defense Committee for 18 years. In the Ukraine, arm the people there so they can fight for themselves. In the eastern part of Europe, make sure that Finland and the Baltics know that if the Russians move, we move.

In Syria, yes, a no-fly zone in the north on the Turkish border, a no-fly zone on the south on the Jordanian border. Anybody flies in the first time, maybe they can fly out. They fly in there a second time, they will not fly out. And it also becomes a sanctuary for the people to be. Saudi Arabia, cut off the funding for the radical clerics, the ones that preach against us.

Jordan, we want the king to reign for 1, years. Egypt, they have been our ally and a moderating force in the Middle East throughout their history. In the groups — in the countries of the Gulf states of Bahrain, the Cleveland Clinic is opening an operation.

Clearly we see the same with them. And in Israel, we have no better ally in the world, and no more criticizing them in public, we should support them. They are not our enemy, but they are certainly not our friend. And finally, I will say to everyone in this room, we have been talking about taxes and economics.

When the fall comes, and we run against Hillary, which will be a disaster if she got elected. I have two year-old girls, and I want this country to be strong. We must make sure that economic programs and our military programs are solid.

I served in Washington as the chairman of the Budget Committee, and we got the budget balanced. And our ideas have to add up. They have to be solid. And people have to know we have the confidence to lead America. And as president, I will lead this country, as I have before in Washington and in Ohio, and will return both on domestic and international affairs. And I appreciate the opportunity to speak this time, Gerry. And look at the time, look at the time. Would you? If we were serious about it, we would raise the capital requirements and lessen the load on the community banks and other financial institutions.

This vast overreach has created a huge problem for our country, and Hillary Clinton wants to double down on that. I was in Washington, Iowa, about three months ago talking about how bad Washington, D. It was — get the — kind of the — anyway.

We had…. It — and I talked to a banker there. The net effect of that is — and they had — they had not one loan that went bad during the financial crisis. They knew — they knew their borrowers.

They gave back to the community. They were engaged in the community. And imagine America without its community banks. My worry is that the real economy has been hurt by the vast overreach of the Obama administration. And Hillary Clinton, she wants to double down on that. She wants to create even more so. She is a captive of the left of her party to the point now where she is — she was for the trade agreement in — the Pacific agreement. She was — hinted she was for the XL pipeline.

The bigger banks now have more and more control over — over the financial assets of this country. And that is the wrong approach to take. Carson, if I may, just on that point, despite measures taken, as the governor says, since the crisis to make the financial system safer, the major banks in the U.

Do you think JPMorgan and the other big banks should be broken up? Those are the kinds of things that led to the problem in the first place. And I think this all really gets back to this whole regulation issue which is creating a very abnormal situation.

This country was — declared its independence in In less than years, it was the number-one economic power in the world. And the reason was because we had an atmosphere that encouraged entrepreneurial risk- taking and capital investment.

Those are the fuels that drive it. If we can get that out, it makes a big difference. And even for the average person, every single regulation costs money. So — and it hurts the poor and the middle class much more than it does the rich. They go into the store and they buy a bar of soap, it costs 10 cents more, they notice it.

And the middle class, when they come to the cash register, have a whole cart full of things that cost 5, 10 or 15 cents more, they notice it. It is hurting the poor. We have to come back to the fundamental principles that made America great.

But what does help us is stop tinkering around the edges and fix the actual problems that exist that are creating the problem in the first place. Do you know why these banks are so big? The government made them big. The government made them big by adding thousands and thousands of pages of regulations. So the big banks, they have an army of lawyers, they have an army of compliance officers. They can deal with all these things. And so the result is, the big banks get bigger, the small banks struggle to lend or even exist, and the result is what you have today.

And in Dodd-Frank, you have actually codified too big to fail. We have actually created a category of systemically important institutions, and these banks go around bragging about it. You know what they say to people with a wink and a nod? We are so big, we are so important that if we get in trouble, the government has to bail us out. This is an outrage.

We need to repeal Dodd-Frank as soon as possible. Let me — let me also say, Gary — Gary, let me also say, Jeb is — what Jeb is talking about with the big banks is to force them to reserve their capital, people who invest it and they hold their capital, so that if the bank goes down, the people who are invested in the bank are the ones that pay. But you know Michael Novak, the great Catholic theologian, says that a free enterprise system that is not underlaid with values — and we should all think about the way we conduct our lives — yes, free enterprise is great, profits are great, but there have to be some values that underlay it, and they need a good ethics lesson on Wall Street on a regular basis to keep them in check so we, the people, do not lose.

Senator Cruz — and I will get to you — but, Senator Cruz, on that theme, Facebook data shows that over the last month alone, nearly 1 million people — nearly 1 million — have been concerned about reining in Wall Street, apparently believing that some have not been punished enough.

So, as an accomplished litigator yourself and a former solicitor general, would you go after the very people who believe and fear that Wall Street has ignored, in other words, the crooks that Bernie Sanders say have gotten away with a financial murder?

Absolutely yes. You know, I have spent much of my adult life enforcing the law and defending the Constitution. And the problem that underlies all of this is the cronyism and corruption of Washington. You know, the opening question Jerry asked, would you bail out the big banks again? Nobody gave you an answer to that.

Played by Julian Barratt. He also appeared in the Future Sailors Live show. The Mighty Boosh Wiki Explore. Wiki Content. Tundra television episode Killeroo Mutants Bollo television episode Jungle television episode Charlie television episode Electro.

Explore Wikis Community Central. Register Don't have an account? The Crack Fox. Edit source History Talk 0. He is played by Julian Barratt. That fox, my friend, was none other than me, the Crack Fox. Hopefully, reaping what they have sown. Loss, loss, loss. Until some other judge overturns that ruling, I would imagine…. Thanks so much for posting it in its entirety. I saw where one of the House of Representatives entered the entire interview into the Congressional Record.

Utterly superb. It is mesmerizing and the good doctor is absolutely brilliant. Pretty sure I found it on Gettr. Unfortunately I failed to write down the name and link for the podcaster so I lost that video permanently. The Gettr stream moves very quickly. I hope they do another dual podcast. Very interesting to hear and contrast the two of them speaking together.

When an originator of anything publicly speaks out about its use, we should all listen and be provided his facts. Instead, he is quieted while the government mandates usage? This is USA? Spend time pondering before replying. Transcript of Joe Rogan Interviewing Dr.

Robert Malone January 3, Sundance Comments. The entire transcript of the 3-hour interview is 43 pages. Notify of. Inline Feedbacks. Feral Cat. January 3, pm. Reply to Feral Cat. Reply to Dixie. Evil does what evil does Too far for me to travel to, thinking…local…peaceful might be my answer to participate.

January 5, am. Reply to jeans2nd. January 5, pm. Sanitary bathroom access denied. Urinate in the street.

They promote that anyways. Oh, and I mention the tactic help of the DC Republicans? January 4, am. January 4, pm. Reply to LEET. Reply to Pew-Anon. Mass formation in action.

Google caught red-handed manipulating the narrative. Reply to TJ. Reply to janice. But this is nevertheless another big crack in the Hoover Dam of lies. Reply to Beverly. They do attempt to control, but yes, big crack! Reply to truthbetold. Me too, truthbetold. Will listen to it again. Hard to retain all three hours of it. Dan Patterson. Reply to Dan Patterson.

Reply to WhiteBoard. Bitter Clinger. Reply to tommy mc donnell. I view Breitbart exactly as I do Faux news. Reply to Winston. Reply to Kaco. I believe you originally had posted this tweet. Reply to JustLikeSpock. Reply to AWM. Watersnake Oz. Never think you are alone! Insurrection Indigestion.

Maddening and eye opening that propaganda mouthpiece Rachel has so many deceived. Where did you get the idea that Rachel has any viewers left to speak of? Reply to Landslide. Reply to Buckskin. Abolition Man. Reply to Abolition Man. Reply to Liz. Russian Roulette. Got a link on that angle? Sundance is also nuanced. We need more reliable data, always. More input! Ruth Schimmelpfennig. I accessed it through American Thinker before Sundance posted it.

Always remember social media is not for info sharing, it is for info control. Reply to CatharineDenver. Bullwinkle strikes again!! You make me once again jealous of the types of representatives you have in TX. Never heard of Troy Nehls before but this is a genius move. From the moonbat capital, blueMA…. Sarah Lee. William Gaynor. Reply to Sarah Lee. As long as no symptoms, no problem. Reply to William Gaynor. Reply to Charlotte Reply to Marcusliciniuscrassus. Reply to doohmax.

Right to reply. Reply to Right to reply. The Gipper Lives. Last edited 10 days ago by The Gipper Lives. Johnny Dollar. I think he is a kook,too. By the way, the kook has overstated his part in the development of mRNA. Last edited 10 days ago by Johnny Dollar. Reply to Johnny Dollar. He bills himself as the inventor. Do I need to drag out all his quotes on that? Have you looked at the lead page in his website. His latest shtick is an attempt to associate himself with Reiner Fuellmich.

Amber Dekstris. I believe that all four of those things can be true simultaneously. Reply to G. The Atlantic has bemonstered itself over the last several years. Much like The New Yorker. Wow, what a great image. I love IowaHawk. Therefore: a The vaccines, to me, are trying to suppress the effects of virus that does not exist. Have to agree, Kaco, having just got over delta.

Loss of taste and smell is weird and novel. And where did this actual lab-created virus come from? Communist China. Hmm, maybe the Cheetos-dust-encrusted paycheck comes from there too…. Reply to Jahealy. If I want the truth about malone I should listen to what malone says? Otherwise malone would be nowhere near these talking heads. Whens the last time you saw a malone interview where he was asked a tough question? IMHO of course!